Assumed Risk

In the few states where the Contributory Negligence Rule applies, "assumed risk" may be valid basis of denial of a claimant's personal injury claim. Basically, if a person’s actions contribute to or are partially to blame for the accident he or she will not be able to recover their damages from the other driver. In these states, the "assumed risk" or "assumption of risk" defense is usually the only way an insurance carrier can deny a passenger’s personal injury claim. Since a passenger is literally just along for the ride and is not in control of any vehicle, how can their personal injury claim be denied?

The term "assumption of risk" simply means that the injured person realized the risk inherent in situation that caused his injury, yet still became involved in the situation: that somehow the passenger assumed the risk of being involved in an accident and is therefore barred from making a claim against any driver. An example might be a case where a sober passenger knowingly entered a vehicle being driven by someone who was obviously intoxicated. It would be reasonable to expect that the intoxicated person might have an accident: the passenger accepted that risk when they got into the car.

Most assumption of risk cases do involve an intoxicated driver and a passenger who knew about the impairment. There are other examples, but these cases arise less often. For example, the injured person may have been a passenger who knowingly entered a vehicle being driven by a person with a lengthy record of speeding violations resulting in a multitude of accidents. A passenger may egg a driver on to race other vehicles on the highway. Teenagers who willingly surf on the hoods of their friends’ moving vehicles and fall off will probably find their claims denied for assumption of risk. Any case where a passenger should realize that there is a high likelihood of an accident occurring yet proceeds to participate gives insurance companies a chance to raise an assumption of risk defense. The greater the opportunity the passenger had to exit the vehicle prior to the accident or not enter it at all, the stronger the insurance company’s defense will be.

If you were a passenger injured in a motor vehicle accident and your personal injury claim has been denied based on assumption of risk, this may be one of the few times we take a side and encourage you to seek legal counsel. In many jurisdictions, an assumption of risk is difficult to prove. Many potential jurors still believe that passengers simply cannot be denied.

This article is not intended to take the place of competent local legal counsel.

Related Links regarding liability rules and issues:

The Boulevard Rule explained.

Comparative Negligence explained.

Contributory Negligence explained.

The Intentional Act Exclusion explained.

Joint and Several Liability explained.

The Last Clear Chance Rule explained.

Mitigation of Damages explained.

Negligent Entrustment explained.

Have Something to Share About This Topic?

Do you have something to share about this topic? Please share with us.

What Other Visitors Have Said

Click below to see contributions from other visitors to this page...

An Infant Child Cannot be Found To Have Assumed the Risk of Injury 
An infant child cannot be found to have assumed the risk of personal injury, nor can the negligence of a parent who placed him or her in that position …

Failure to Wear a Helmet While Riding Motorcycle Could Affect Personal Injury Claim Settlement 
Can the insurance company penalize my son for not wearing his helmet when they make a settlement offer on his personal injury claim? He was on a motorcycle. …

Failure to Use a Seatbelt is Usually Not Admissible in Personal Injury Claims Not rated yet
Even though most states now have mandatory seat belt laws, the failure to use a seatbelt is almost never inadmissible either to reduce the amount of money …

Click here to write your own.

From Assumed Risk to Insurance Claims Help For You